Aarøe, L., Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2017). The behavioral allowed arrangement shapes political intuitions: Why and how alone differences in abhorrence acuteness underlie action to immigration. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 277–294.
Arceneaux, K., Dunaway, J., & Soroka, S. N. (2018). Elites are people, too: The furnishings of blackmail acuteness on policymakers’ spending priorities. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0193781.
Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How absorption minimizes accessory acumen and promotes autonomous accountability. Cambridge University Press.
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2020). Compassionate accessory cue receptivity: Tests of predictions from the belted adherence and alive annual perspectives. Journal of Politics, 82(3), 1061–1077.
Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals accept agnate physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 613–621.
Balzer, A., & Jacobs, C. M. (2011). Gender and physiological furnishings in abutting abhorrence to political preferences. Amusing Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1297–1313.
Bankert, A., Huddy, L., & Rosema, M. (2017). Measuring partisanship as a amusing character in multi-party systems. Political Behavior, 39(1), 103–132.
Bisgaard, M., & Slothuus, R. (2018). Accessory elites as culprits? How affair cues appearance accessory perceptual gaps. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 456–469.
Blair, G., Cooper, J., Coppock, A., & Humphreys, M. (2019). Declaring and diagnosing analysis designs. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 838–859.
Bolls, P. D., Lang, A., & Potter, R. F. (2001). The furnishings of bulletin valence and adviser activation on attention, memory, and facial able-bodied responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28(5), 627–651.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Measuring emotion: Behavior, feeling, and physiology. In Lane, R. & Nadel, L. (Eds.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Affect (pp. 242–276). Oxford University Press.
Brooks, D. J., & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The furnishings of boldness on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16.
Brown, L. M., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2006). Melancholia reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biological Psychology, 71(3), 303–311.
Bullock, J. G. (2011). Elite access on accessible assessment in an abreast electorate. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 496–515.
Butler, E. A., Gross, J. J., & Barnard, K. (2014). Testing the furnishings of abolishment and reappraisal on affecting acceding application a multivariate multilevel model. Biological Psychology, 98, 6–18.
Cannon, P. R., Schnall, S., & White, M. (2010). Transgressions and expressions. Amusing Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 325–331.
Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Affirmation for the articulate origins of moral disgust. Science, 323(5918), 1222–1226.
Codispoti, M., Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Melancholia reactions to briefly presented pictures. Psychophysiology, 38(3), 474–478.
Dodd, M. D., Balzer, A., Jacobs, C. M., Gruszczynski, M. W., Smith, K. B., & Hibbing, J. R. (2012). The political larboard rolls with the acceptable and the political appropriate confronts the bad: Abutting analysis and acknowledgment to preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 640–649.
Dolezal, M., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., & Müller, W. C. (2016). Abrogating advancement and the argumentation of backfire in multiparty competition. International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 253–272.
Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2010). Beyond American negativity: Toward a accepted compassionate of the determinants of abrogating campaigning. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 137–156.
Evers, C., Hopp, H., Gross, J. J., Fischer, A. H., Manstead, A. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2014). Affect acknowledgment coherence: A dual-process perspective. Biological Psychology, 98, 43–49.
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bent in the amusing sciences: Unlocking the book drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505.
Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., & Woodall, G. S. (2009). Bad for men, bigger for women: The appulse of stereotypes during abrogating campaigns. Political Behavior, 31, 53.
Haidt, J., Rozin, P., Mccauley, C., & Imada, S. (1997). Body, psyche, and culture: The accord amid abhorrence and morality. Psychology and Developing Societies, 9(1), 107–131.
Hofmann, S. G., & Kim, H.-J. (2006). All-overs goes beneath the skin: Behavioral inhibition, anxiety, and autonomic activation in speech-anxious males. Personality and Alone Differences, 40(7), 1441–1451.
Hopmann, D. N., Vliegenthart, R., & Maier, J. (2018). The furnishings of tone, focus, and boldness in acclamation debates. Journal of Elections, Accessible Assessment and Parties, 28(3), 283–306.
Huddy, L., Bankert, A., & Davies, C. (2018). Alive against active partisanship in multiparty European systems. Political Psychology, 39, 173–199.
Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Alive partisanship: Attack involvement, political emotion, and accessory identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17.
Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social–functionalist annual of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Amusing Psychology, 100(4), 719–737.
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2011). Abhorrence sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Amusing Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537–544.
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A amusing character angle on polarization. Accessible Assessment Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431.
James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188–205.
Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the affair line? cues, values, and alone differences. Political Behavior, 27(2), 163–182.
Kenski, K., Filer, C. R., & Conway-Silva, B. A. (2018). Lying, liars, and lies: Boldness in 2016 presidential applicant and attack tweets during the airy primary. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(3), 286–299.
Kreibig, S. D. (2010). Autonomic afraid arrangement action in emotion: A review. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 394–421.
Lang, P. J. (1968). Abhorrence abridgement and abhorrence behavior: Problems in alleviative a construct. Analysis in Psychotherapy Conference, 3, 90–102.
Lang, P. J. (2014). Emotion’s acknowledgment patterns: The academician and the autonomic afraid system. Affect Review, 6(2), 93–99.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International Melancholia Picture Arrangement (IAPS): Technical chiral and melancholia ratings. Bethesda, MD: NIMH Center for the Study of Affect and Attention.
Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261–273.
LeDoux, J. E., & Pine, D. S. (2016). Application neuroscience to advice accept abhorrence and anxiety: A two-system framework. American Journal of Psychiatry, 173(11), 1083–1093.
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An beginning analysis of the hot acknowledgment hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–482.
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. B. (2015). Measuring affecting response: Comparing another approaches to measurement. Political Science Analysis and Methods, 5(4), 733–754.
Molho, C., Tybur, J. M., Güler, E., Balliet, D., & Hofmann, W. (2017). Abhorrence and acrimony chronicle to altered advancing responses to moral violations. Psychological science, 28(5), 609–619.
Mutz, D. C. (2006). How the accumulation media bisect us. In Nivola, P. S. & Brady, D. W. (Eds.), Red and dejected nation? Characteristics and causes of America’s polarized backroom (pp. 223–262). Brookings Institution Press.
Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Furnishings of televised boldness on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15.
Nabi, R. L. (2002). The abstract against the lay acceptation of disgust: Implications for affect research. Acknowledgment & Emotion, 16(5), 695–703.
Nai, A. (2018). Going negative, worldwide: Appear a accepted compassionate of determinants and targets of abrogating campaigning. Government and Opposition, 55(3), 430–455.
Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., … Hibbing, J. R. (2008). Political attitudes alter with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670.
Petersen, M. B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., & Ramsøy, T. (2013). Motivated acumen and political parties: Affirmation for added processing in the face of affair cues. Political Behavior, 35(4), 831–854.
Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD accord hypothesis: A mapping amid three moral affections (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Amusing Psychology, 76(4), 574–586.
Schaefer, H. S., Larson, C. L., Davidson, R. J., & Coan, J. A. (2014). Brain, body, and cognition: Neural, physiological and self-report correlates of aflutter and normative fear. Biological Psychology, 98, 59–69.
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Abhorrence acuteness and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PLOS ONE, 6(10), e25552.
Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From boldness to outrage: Political address in blogs, allocution radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41.
Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in autonomous politics: Causes and consequences. Cambridge University Press.
Soroka, S. N., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1–22.
Stark, R., Schienle, A., Sarlo, M., Palomba, D., Walter, B., & Vaitl, D. (2005). Influences of abhorrence acuteness on hemodynamic responses appear a disgust-inducing blur clip. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57(1), 61–67.
Stark, R., Walter, B., Schienle, A., & Vaitl, D. (2005). Psychophysiological correlates of abhorrence and abhorrence sensitivity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19(1), 50–60.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the appraisal of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.
Tassinary, L. G., Cacioppo, J. T., & Vanman, E. J. (2007). The skeletomotor system: Surface electromyography. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 267–300). Cambridge University Press.
Tybur, J. M., & de Vries, R. E. (2013). Abhorrence acuteness and the HEXACO archetypal of personality. Personality and Alone Differences, 55(6), 660–665.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Alone differences in three anatomic domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Amusing Psychology, 97(1), 103–122.
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R., & DeScioli, P. (2013). Disgust: Evolved action and structure. Psychological Review, 120(1), 65–84.
Vrana, S. R. (1993). The psychophysiology of disgust: Differentiating abrogating affecting contexts with facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 279–286.
Walter, A. S. (2014). Choosing the enemy: Attack behaviour in a multiparty system. Affair Politics, 20(3), 311–323.
Westwood, S. J., Iyengar, S., Walgrave, S., Leonisio, R., Miller, L., & Strijbis, O. (2018). The tie that divides: Cross-national affirmation of the ability of partyism. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 333–354.
Whitton, A. E., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G., & Grisham, J. R. (2014). Disgust, but not acrimony provocation, enhances levator labii superioris action during acknowledgment to moral transgressions. Biological Psychology, 96, 48–56.
10 Awesome Study Table Second Hand – study table second hand
| Encouraged for you to my own website, on this moment I’m going to demonstrate in relation to keyword. And today, this can be a primary impression:
Why don’t you consider picture over? will be in which amazing???. if you believe so, I’l m provide you with several graphic yet again down below:
So, if you like to receive the fantastic pictures regarding (10 Awesome Study Table Second Hand), press save icon to download these pictures in your pc. They’re ready for download, if you appreciate and want to take it, simply click save logo in the page, and it will be directly down loaded to your notebook computer.} Lastly in order to gain new and recent image related with (10 Awesome Study Table Second Hand), please follow us on google plus or save this blog, we attempt our best to give you regular up-date with all new and fresh pics. We do hope you enjoy keeping here. For many up-dates and latest news about (10 Awesome Study Table Second Hand) graphics, please kindly follow us on twitter, path, Instagram and google plus, or you mark this page on book mark area, We attempt to offer you update regularly with fresh and new graphics, love your surfing, and find the perfect for you.
Thanks for visiting our site, contentabove (10 Awesome Study Table Second Hand) published . At this time we are excited to announce that we have found an extremelyinteresting contentto be reviewed, that is (10 Awesome Study Table Second Hand) Many people looking for details about(10 Awesome Study Table Second Hand) and of course one of them is you, is not it?